Web analytics should at least meet the standards of informed consent December 4, 2020 on Drew DeVault's blog

Research conducted on human beings, at least outside of the domain of technology, has to meet a minimum standard of ethical reasoning called informed consent. Details vary, but the general elements of informed consent are:

  1. Disclosure of the nature and purpose of the research and its implications (risks and benefits) for the participant, and the confidentiality of the collected information.
  2. An adequate understanding of these facts on the part of the participant, requiring an accessible explanation in lay terms and an assessment of understanding.
  3. The participant must exercise voluntary agreement, without coercion or fear of repercussions (e.g. not being allowed to use your website).

So, I pose the following question: if your analytics script wouldn’t pass muster at your university’s ethics board, then what the hell is it doing on your website? Can we not meet this basic minimum standard of ethical decency and respect for our users?

Opt-out is not informed consent. Manually unticking dozens of third-party trackers from a cookie pop-up is not informed consent. “By continuing to use this website, you agree to…” is not informed consent. “Install uBlock Origin” is not informed consent.

I don’t necessarily believe that ethical user tracking is impossible, but I know for damn sure that most of these “pro-privacy” analytics solutions which have been cropping up in the wake of the GDPR don’t qualify, either.

Our industry’s fundamental failure to respect users, deliberately mining their data without consent and without oversight for profit, is the reason why we’re seeing legal crackdowns in the form of the GDPR and similar legislation. Our comeuppance is well-earned, and I hope that the regulators give it teeth in enforcement. The industry response — denial and looking for ways to weasel out of these ethical obligations — is a strategy on borrowed time. The law is not a computer program, and it is not executed by computers: it is executed by human beings who can see through your horseshit. You’re not going to be able to seek out some narrow path you can walk to skirt the regulations and keep spying on people.

You’re going to stop spying on people.

P.S. If you still want the data you might get from analytics without compromising on ethics, here’s an idea: compensate users for their participation in your research. Woah, what a wild idea! That’s not very growth hacker of you, Drew.

Articles from blogs I read Generated by openring

Blocking Claude

Claude, a popular Large Language Model (LLM), has a magic string which is used to test the model’s “this conversation violates our policies and has to stop” behavior. You can embed this string into files and web pages, and Claude will terminate conversati…

via Aphyr: Posts January 26, 2026

Hare meetup at FOSDEM 2026

The Hare community is hosting a meetup at FOSDEM 2026 and we would love to meet you there and discuss your projects and the direction of the Hare programming language in the coming year. We will be meeting in UA4.228 at 14:00 on Saturday: check the schedule. S…

via Blogs on The Hare programming language January 22, 2026

BodgeOS pt.6

Getting KiCad working One of the things I want to get working is KiCad so I can also do the electrical design stuff also on the laptop I'm bringing to FOSDEM. It turns out this is pretty hard since I've been building BodgeOS as wayland-only distrib…

via BrixIT Blog January 18, 2026