When not to use a regex August 13, 2017 on Drew DeVault's blog

The other day, I saw Learn regex the easy way. This is a great resource, but I felt the need to pen a post explaining that regexes are usually not the right approach.

Let’s do a little exercise. I googled “URL regex” and here’s the first Stack Overflow result:

https?:\/\/(www\.)?[-a-zA-Z0-9@:%._\+~#=]{2,256}\.[a-z]{2,6}\b([-a-zA-Z0-9@:%_\+.~#?&//=]*)

source

This is a bad regex. Here are some valid URLs that this regex fails to match:

Here are some invalid URLs the regex is fine with:

This answer has been revised 9 times on Stack Overflow, and this is the best they could come up with. Go back and read the regex. Can you tell where each of these bugs are? How long did it take you? If you received a bug report in your application because one of these URLs was handled incorrectly, do you understand this regex well enough to fix it? If your application has a URL regex, go find it and see how it fares with these tests.

Complicated regexes are opaque, unmaintainable, and often wrong. The correct approach to validating a URL is as follows:

from urllib.parse import urlparse

def is_url_valid(url):
    try:
        urlparse(url)
        return True
    except:
        return False

A regex is useful for validating simple patterns and for finding patterns in text. For anything beyond that it’s almost certainly a terrible choice. Say you want to…

validate an email address: try to send an email to it!

validate password strength requirements: estimate the complexity with zxcvbn!

validate a date: use your standard library! datetime.datetime.strptime

validate a credit card number: run the Luhn algorithm on it!

validate a social security number: alright, use a regex. But don’t expect the number to be assigned to someone until you ask the Social Security Administration about it!

Get the picture?

Articles from blogs I read Generated by openring

Vindicated: Icons suck

They updated the Android alarm interface.5 years ago, I complained about the alarm interface in my post about how icons suck. At the time of writing, it was a chaotic spread of icons with unclear interactions.In terms of beauty, it's a masterpiece, bu…

via Cadence's Weblog August 4, 2025

Upcoming changes to Hare's event loop library

hare-ev is an important Hare library that provides an event loop for Hare programs, similar to libuv, which most Hare programs which perform asynchronous I/O depend on for that purpose. I’ve been working on some design improvements over the past couple of we…

via Blogs on The Hare programming language July 30, 2025

SourceHut is now accepting payments in Euro

I’m pleased to announce that, as part of our broader plans to migrate SourceHut to Europe, and after many months of hard work, SourceHut has begun to accept subscription payments in Euro today – one of our oldest and most highly demanded feature requests. Th…

via Blogs on Sourcehut July 10, 2025