When not to use a regex August 13, 2017 on Drew DeVault's blog

The other day, I saw Learn regex the easy way. This is a great resource, but I felt the need to pen a post explaining that regexes are usually not the right approach.

Let’s do a little exercise. I googled “URL regex” and here’s the first Stack Overflow result:

https?:\/\/(www\.)?[-a-zA-Z0-9@:%._\+~#=]{2,256}\.[a-z]{2,6}\b([-a-zA-Z0-9@:%_\+.~#?&//=]*)

source

This is a bad regex. Here are some valid URLs that this regex fails to match:

Here are some invalid URLs the regex is fine with:

This answer has been revised 9 times on Stack Overflow, and this is the best they could come up with. Go back and read the regex. Can you tell where each of these bugs are? How long did it take you? If you received a bug report in your application because one of these URLs was handled incorrectly, do you understand this regex well enough to fix it? If your application has a URL regex, go find it and see how it fares with these tests.

Complicated regexes are opaque, unmaintainable, and often wrong. The correct approach to validating a URL is as follows:

from urllib.parse import urlparse

def is_url_valid(url):
    try:
        urlparse(url)
        return True
    except:
        return False

A regex is useful for validating simple patterns and for finding patterns in text. For anything beyond that it’s almost certainly a terrible choice. Say you want to…

validate an email address: try to send an email to it!

validate password strength requirements: estimate the complexity with zxcvbn!

validate a date: use your standard library! datetime.datetime.strptime

validate a credit card number: run the Luhn algorithm on it!

validate a social security number: alright, use a regex. But don’t expect the number to be assigned to someone until you ask the Social Security Administration about it!

Get the picture?

Articles from blogs I read Generated by openring

Feelings outlive paper, paper outlives feelings

A letter is communication. Communication of information and communication of feelings. Letters from my bank have little feelings (and sometimes little information too). Letters from individual people have a lot of feelings, even if they didn't intend …

via Cadence's Weblog September 5, 2025

What's cooking on SourceHut? Q3 2025

Hello everyone! It’s time for another quarterly update on what we’re up to at SourceHut. There’s a lot of great stuff going on since you last heard from us! Let’s get started. Drew’s update We finally rolled out the billing overhaul! God, that was so much work…

via Blogs on Sourcehut September 1, 2025

Astound Supports IPv6 Only in Washington

In the hopes that it saves someone else two hours later: the ISP Astound only supports IPv6 in Washington State. You might find this page which says “Astound supports IPv6 in most locations”. Their tech support agents might tell you that they support v6 o…

via Aphyr: Posts August 26, 2025